Only going forward, because I can’t find reverse

…. Because the gearbox is F*d!

So, there we go, normal day on the way into work, about 3/4 mile away from work, when I grabbed the gearknob, and pressed the clutch, and pulled the stick from 3rd into 4th, and released the clutch……

….. and the RPM stayed the same….

So, I dropped it back into 3rd, and released the clutch – same thing. Bollocks…..

Quick drop into 5th -and still the blasted revs stay the same for any given road speed.

Fuckity fuck – I’m solidly stuck in 3rd.

So, that’s either a shift linkage issue, or something deeper, darker and much worse – something to do with dark magic inside the box of mystical cogs and shafts known as the gearbox.

A little bit of investigation with a colleague at work and we establish that the shift linkages are all working as they should when you stir the stick – but bits of metal inside the box aren’t disengaging – worse still – it’s possible to engage reverse, whilst the blasted thing is stuck in 3rd – needless to say that’s an instant stall when releasing the clutch (better that than whole gears or shafts tearing themselves asunder – or the cast case shattering and dumping 2 1/2 litres of stinky, shitty ‘box oil on the floor)

A little bit or persuasion form the guys at work, and I leave at 10:30, and make the 29 mile run home in third, and finished the day working from home.

Now – this is all going on as our new arrival is still in hospital – I need transport, thankfully I have the RS, but, it uses fuel like it’s going out of fashion in comparison – it’s why it’s not my daily car (and I kinda want to try and keep the mileage down on it)

Bollocks – definitely, and no dogs involved.

Coffee shop relaxation

This is the result of what I was going to blog when I was relaxing and having a coffee and sarnie, by the way of a very late lunch after a morning TKD session. (that incidentally was a sweat box, but very much fun 😀 )

Well, I thought I’d attempt the classic techie shopping and lunch trip – and by the by, have a nice coffee in a random coffee shop and do some surfing.

So, after getting one or two little items, which was a little less than I had thought, or wanted, but one store didn’t have what I was looking for, I thought I would sit down in MK’s Starbucks or Costa, and enjoy some gentle caffeine enhanced relaxation.

So – first off, I wanted Internet, you know, catch up on some of the news I’ve missed, maybe even write a blog post about something, simple enough I guess, my MacBook connected to “_The_Cloud” – but then I can’t surf without signing up – or remembering what I signed up with on my iPhone what seems like a billion years ago, and connecting and resetting my password would mean I needed access to email – which requires Internet access…. which.. yeah, ok see the problem ? (Astute readers will say why didn’t I read the email off my phone ? – well…… )

OK then, lets try my iPhone itself, and tether.

4 attempts at connecting, ok, I can’t whinge too loudly at that, I haven’t connected this MacBook to my iPhone (did with my old MacBook)

A tiny glimpse of Internet via my Galaxy SIII, so I kick off an update of a plugin on a website of min, but…… then nothing.

So that is Problem 2 – Vodafone, whilst saying I have 4 bars, and 3G signal (this being an iPhone 4S – no 4G), I have now lost the Internet. (so, back to problem about getting email….)

OK – try again, with my Samsumg Galaxy SIII mini, and although this connected first time (but, I have used that phone on this MacBook whilst I was on holiday last week), but, again, although the service provider is saying decent signal – I’ve got no Internet.

And the biggest pain in the arse of all – I didn’t charge any of my devices last night, so whilst I am now currently writing this on a MacBoook Pro in Pages instead of online on my blog, I’m doing it with only 11% of battery 🙁

OK – it reckons 0:39 hours left, which should mean I make it to the end of my steak and cheese sarnie and coffee, but, pretty much bugger all else.

So I’ve dropped the backlit keyboard off, and dropped the screen brightness down to a point where it’s dark enough to almost think the text is dark grey on a slightly lighter dark grey – and the battery life has now dropped to 0:35 remaining.

And the update of a plugin on my site, still hasn’t finished –  the connection I have, tenuous at best, hasn’t been fast enough to update the page quick enough before I was careless, and lost the Internet.

So what I have done with this blog entry, is write it in Pages, so that I can get my thoughts down, and will upload when I get home, to something approaching a broadband connection.

Question is, will I get to the end of writing the blog entry before the battery on the MackBook dies ?

Chances are actually pretty good, it’s a decent bit of kit to be fair, but technology, batteries especially, don’t last forever.

Now my iPhone is at 15%, and GSIII is at 21%, and this MacBook is 7%, I’ve finished my coffee, and more than ready to go home.

So, technology makes things easier ?

Hmmmm, today, not so convinced, although I did want a nice relaxing time in a coffee shop, I got one, just not in the way I had envisaged.

I would have been better off reading a book, but my Kindle isn’t charged……

Apple Time Capsule Repair (Part 1)

Yes, of course, I am talking about an Apple Time Capsule, which, as we all know, are a little too prone to expiring a little young. Well, I am an owner of one of these afflicted devices, the downside is that I used it both as a backup device, and as a wireless access point, so, in one go, I’ve lost two useful devices. Well, as my alter ego MacGyver has a knack of resurrecting dead hardware and technology, I figured I would try some to work some Lazarus style resurrection on my Time Capsule. There are a number of sites on the Internet that deal with the results of the failure, and have a number of different ways of resurrecting the device, from the sensible, to the frankly insane (external wall-wart with a butchered power socket). After a bit of research I have found that two sites give a broadly similar method of repair,  that of Chris Fackrell, and Lapastenague, and therefore embarked on my journey. First off, when I came to dismantling the TC, I admit I was a little impatient, primarily because I was rather annoyed about the device failing, and therefore I wasn’t taking as much care as I possible could have done, and during the process of removing the rubber foot on the device, I tore the rubber 🙁   Overall this doesn’t make a huge difference in the finished repaired article, but, it’s just a known annoyance from my perspective, I will live with it.

Capacitor Plague
Capacitor Plague

So, rubber foot removed, and screws pulled out from the bottom, and everything now nicely exposed, I got to what everyone was saying was the root cause – a fried power supply. They were right. I had fried capacitors on the PSU module. JOY. It’s not the first time I have had a device with fried capacitors, if anyone does a Google search for “capacitor plague” then you will find out the extent of the problem in recent years, and some potential theories on the root cause. Frankly, I don’t give a hoot about the precise root cause, unless it’s exacerbated by some pretty piss-poor design, and in the case of the Apple TC, that is precisely what we have. The TC is a device that has 3 modules, a PSU, a hard drive, and a system board, and all three modules generate heat by due nature of having electricity running through them.

The hard drive, in my case, a Western Digital Black Series, is designed for high performance devices, with barely a secondary care for heat generation. It’s the sort of hard drive designed for those people that like to have oversized desktop cases with lots of colourful fans inside to keep the PC inside cool. (Hey – I was one of that crowd at one point in my life – so I won’t knock ’em) Let’s put it another way, the drive definitely isn’t a Western Digital Green Series, designed for low power and low heat generation, the kind of drive required for such a little device such as the Apple TC. Another issue, where is the cooling for the TC ? Apple, in their infinite wisdom included  a fan inside the TC, but there are a couple of serious flaws with that in itself.

Firstly, and I would say, foremost, a fan is designed to move air around – but in the case of the TC, where is it going to get air from ? No-where, the aforementioned rubber foot on the device covers all the holes in the bottom of the case, and, the holes in the bottom of the case are so few and far between (and so small) that the are essentially a decorative option in the aluminium panel at best (if the foot wasn’t covering them!).

The second problem – it “blows” air directly at the hard drive – the side of the hard drive, at the end furthest away from the power connectors – and there is, at best, a 2mm gap between the fan and the hard drive – so no where for the “air” to go to go over the surface of the hard drive, which would make the fan somewhat more useful.

And thirdly – I’ve never heard the fan come on…….. ….ever…. *UNTIL* I pulled the cable off the heat sensor that is attached to the hard drive, then the TC sounds like a muffled jet as the fan comes on at full chat, and the lovely green LED on the front goes orange, and the TC warns you via AirPort utility that the TC might be overheating. (more about that later – at the moment, I have a dead TC) Bollocks, and definitely no dogs involved. So, what am I going to do to get this thing working again ?

Well, following some of Chris Fackrell’s instructions, I start to look at getting the casing off the PSU module, whereupon, the thin black plastic takes on the structural consistency of a Cadbury’s flake, so getting something resembling a secure and safe “casing” to the PSU module back together post repair was nigh-on impossible, and unlike Chris, I didn’t fancy hand cutting some special sheeting to fit around the module.

So – I took a chance, a quick scoot round a famous auction site (yes, ok then, eBay), I found  a TC PSU in USA, so quickly entered my PayPal details, and somewhere around the 2 week mark, I had a nice little package waiting for my when I got home from work. First thing I did, was to assemble the PSU module in the TC, and fire the thing up without the case on (carefully – as there is a small risk of zapping oneself on mains level voltage if one is unduly careless) – and as this had passed the “not blow up and spit lots of broken electrics and magic smoke all over the place” test, I went the step further, loosely put the case back on, and plugged in an ethernet cable, and fired up my MacBook to see if everything could see each other, and, thankfully they could – at least the motherboard in the TC worked, and I could, at least in theory now, pull any data off the hard drive. Next step, well, as the TC is a flawed design, heat-wise, I started to look at what I could do to alleviate this issue, and both Christ Fackrell and LaPastenague have some fairly detailed method for solving this, I thought that I would have a go at engineering a longer term “fix”.

Drilling hole in aluminium base plate of TC
Drilling hole in aluminium base plate of TC

So, both agree that the fan is useless, so, lets fix that first, well, we do have to start somewhere  – right ? and at least lets start with something that will help prolong the replacement PSU’s life. I engineered a hole, 40mm (ish) in the bottom of the aluminium plate that forms the bottom of the case on the TC. I didn’t drill this with the rubber foot attached, I didn’t know exactly what the big drill bit would do to the rubber itself, didn’t fancy the teeth catching the rubber and ripping it to shreds, and leaving me with a completely destroyed rubber foot – I’d take it with a tear, as honestly, one can’t see it, when the system is in operation, it is on the underside after all – and only I will know it’s there 🙂

 

Rubber foot, Circular hole
Rubber foot, Circular hole

Now, in line with Chris’ details, and LaPastenague’s photo’s regarding the fan holes, they have quite clearly decided to prevent the ingress of (large) foreign bodies into the system by putting a grill over the fan opening, so, one auction site purchase (eBay) later, I had some stainless steel grill material to go over my newly engineered hole in the aluminium plate. At this moment in time, I took the opportunity to temporarily re-attach the rubber foot, and used a Stanley knife blade to cut out the circular hole in the rubber foot using the hole I had just drilled/cut out as the template for the Stanley blade. I also took this opportunity to make another couple of modifications to the rubber foot.

 

Rubber foot, lots os screw holes.
Rubber foot, lots os screw holes.

Firstly, I figured that I was likely to need to pull the whole thing apart again at some point, and,  therefore, I needed an easier way of getting at the insides of the device, and I don’t fancy pulling the rubber foot off the metal base plate again in any hurry – so getting yet more inspiration (to save the perspiration) from Chris’ breakdown, I used a handy leather punch to “engineer” a series of tiny holes in the rubber foot, precisely where the 10 screws are used to hold the base plate onto the TC chassis. Keeping the little rubber circles that you have cut out, also (again per Chris) says, makes the whole thing look tidy and professional (as much as a hacked hole in the bottom of Apple gear looks) when everything is put back together again.

 

Using external HDD case to give me a nice profile
Using external HDD case to give me a nice profile

Again using Chris’s inspiration, I also took the time to engineer a “lip” in the edge of the rubber foot, to allow a better way for the air that has been forced through the PSU, which by now, is rather warmer than what it was on the way into the TC, to exit the chassis. I found that the edge of an external 2 1/2″ HDD chassis was ideal to get a shape for this relatively delicate work.

Resultant profile
Resultant profile
Give the TC room to expel it's warm air.
Give the TC room to expel it’s warm air.

To be honest, at this point in the “fix”, considering I generally like Apple gear, I am feeling rather disappointed in the “engineering” designs for this product. It doesn’t take a genius to look at this design, and go, “hang on a minute…” (or in the immortal words of Michael Caine, ” ‘ang on lads, I’ve got an idea……” Here I am, with a product, albeit a lot longer past the device warranty status than an awful lot of people got, some had TCs that died within 18 months – if not sooner – mine though, did last best part of 3 years before expiring, and what I am I doing to this product ? Yes – effectively butchering it to turn it into the device that it should have been when it was first purchased – my spin on that is that it’s a total failure at both design, testing, and QA. I bought my MacBook Late 2008, and therefore, I *think* I bought the TC early 2009, and it expired around December 2012, but with everything that life throughs at one – it’s taken me till November 2013 to get around to fixing it ;-(

 

Grill, cut and ready for gluing into place.
Grill, cut and ready for gluing into place.

Nicely snipped the grill to fit around the fan mounting pins, and then glued onto the aluminium base plate – no drama there, used some “standardish” gooey stuff – nothing special as I can’t find my special metal loaded epoxy resin glue 🙁 I think that  it’s in the garage “somewhere” – probably either amongst the spare bits of my nitro-methane powered remote control car, or remote helicopter, or some other crap. Next, again, as with Chris’ beautiful details, I turned the fan upside down, shortened the rubber mounting pins, and re-attached the fan to the base plate. Now, this is where I got intrigued about the fan speed control.

 

 

Fan upside down now.
Fan upside down now.

I mean, the TC has this little wire running from the board to the hard drive, and, if you look at the semiconductor attached to the end of the wire, you find, not what I would immediately expect, a thermistor, but a transistor, a 2N3904, with the base and collector connected electrically together, and, if you use a little bit of brute force to heat this transistor up, (I used a lighter I had kicking around on my desk) you can get the fan to turn on – and turn on it does, not just a little gentle blow, but a full on jet engine, and the TC then whinges in the AirPort application that it’s overheating – bloody hell Apple – either one or the other, and neither particularly “good”. For the moment, however, I need to use my TC in anger, so I’ve disconnected the temperature sensor that is attached to the hard drive of the TC, and bolted the whole lot back together again, and just going to live with the “pain” of the jet engine fan (and whinges of AirPort). Other than the front LED flashing orange at me, and the occasional whinge by my AirPort utility to say that the TC is likely to be overheating, (it isn’t – the fan is running at full chat, and blowing lots of air through the PSU ! Trust me, the whine in my ear tells me so!!!!) the TC now works perfectly.

Ferrari are still cheats

Yes, this is another controversial post, so what, it’s a controversial issue.

Formula 1 has engineered itself criticism again, through the same rules that got the sport into hot water years ago, and even more worrying – by the same team, Ferrari.

I fully agree that it’s a team sport, and one driver should be able to help out the other driver, but, and this to my mind is crucial, it should be that driver’s choice, not the team’s enforcement.

However, once one driver doesn’t have a realistic expectation to win the title, then, I think it is a reasonable expectation from the team that the driver should “move over” during the course of a race, and again, crucially, if, and *only* if that driver’s team-mate is immediately behind them on the track – but *not* by the team deliberately sabotaging the drivers car in the case of what Ferrari did to Massa’s car at the US GP.

What they did, was to deliberately break the seal on the gearbox of Massa’s car, so that they would deliberately get a penalty, of 5 grid positions for Massa, thus both dropping Massa behind Alonso, but also pushing Alonso to the “clean” side of the grid.

That is deciding the outcome of a race outside the scope of actual racing miles.

A race has got to be defined as multiple cars and drivers doing their best with their talents and machinery, to beat the next man out there, the desire to battle it out against all others, and come out on top.

This fight is why I like Hamilton’s style, he is that fighter, like Schumacher, Senna, and Mansell were. (and, to my eyes, a little unlike Prost, Button, Hill, good but too “professor-ish” only doing *just* enough)

Did it work ? Well, it appears that way, Alonso got a good start, and ended up on the podium.

Did it influence the outcome of the championship, definitely, it has pushed the championship to the last race, Bernie and the FIA have got to be delighted about that, which is one reason I think that no sanctions will be metered out to Ferrari.

Ferrari says, through Domenicali, that the deliberate tampering of the seal on Massa’s car was done within the rules, ok, maybe I grant them that, at least to the letter of the rules, however, he also says it was done within the boundaries of the “spirit of the rules”

That, I very much disagree with.

The spirit of any rules in *any* sport is to ensure a fair, consistent level playing field amongst all competitors, this artificial tampering, alters those rules, it changes the playing field, it creates a nasty taste in the mouth.

All the drivers that busted a gut in qualifying, i.e. all of them, ended up the session knowing where they were, and by all judges in the crowd, you know, the important ones, the ones that *PAID* to see the quail session, they had witnessed a proper shoot-out, people ended up in grid slots that were appropriate to the level of  skill, both from car, and driver.

To alter that when *NO* technical rules were broken, is quite frankly appalling.

The grid place penalty is there for one reason, to penalise the driver/team of the car that has *unfairly* gained an advantage through either poor driving, or infringement of the technical rules that ensure the level playing field, such as ensuring the same level of reliability by restrictions on number of gearboxes etc.

Now, if Massa’s gearbox had really broken, then ok, not a problem, but it hadn’t.

I also not sure about the status of things such that if an engineer saw that a gearbox was *going* to fail at some point during the race, should the team be allowed to change it and incur a penalty?

No, I think they should be forced to race, and take the consequences, i.e. a retirement, that is a *MUCH* bigger penalty for mechanical failure than a 5 place grid drop in my (very humble) opinion.

Anyway, back to the “problem” with Massa and his deliberately tampered with gearbox seal.

Well, the 5 place drop made 5 other cars change their positions on the grid.

OK, some could argue that someone who was in 5th, now got promoted to 4th, but, it’s not that easy.

At all circuits, there is a “beneficial” side of the circuit as that is the side of the circuit that the racing line is on, and this means there is more rubber laid down, on this piece of tarmac, which means there is more grip.

In Austin, the track is new, so there is a massive difference in the two sides of the track, so those that qualified in the odd side of the track, and thus behind pole, are on the grippier, or better side of the track.

So, the demotion of Massa, meant a group of drivers got penalised by being put onto the less grippy side of the track – HOWEVER – in Alonso’s case, this meant that he went from the less perfect side, to the better side – all for the team.

Bottom line – Ferrari artificially altered the grid, thus Alonso’s chances in the race at the *detriment* to a number of other drivers on the grid, and *not* because of a technical infringement or technical failure, but by a cynical manipulation of the rules, in complete contrast to the spirit of the said rules.

Martin Whitmarsh, the Mclaren team boss, is a little on the fence.

Reading between his lines here, I get the distinct impression that he doesn’t approve, and also from the same article, I get the impression other teams feel a little uncomfortable.

I can understand why, I feel uncomfortable as a spectator (albeit armchair one)

From where I sit, could I say, that in my humble opinion that Ferrari have brought the crown in the motorsport world into disrepute again ?

Yes – I do, that is what I would charge Ferrari with, bringing the sport into disrepute, but I will bet that no action is taken at the FIA, as it made the last race of the season the title decider, and that will pull in the crowds in Brazil, and on the TV…. and make Bernie a fair few more dollars.

Appliance Insurance.

We all have white goods in our kitchens, be it fridge, freezer, cooker/oven, washing machine, maybe even a tumble dryer and dishwasher, as well as things like boilers elsewhere in the house.

All have electronics and moving parts, so at some point, something is going to break on them.

One’s gas boiler should be regularly serviced every year for safety, I’m not allowed to do that servicing by law, only a registered Gas Safe engineer can do that, and that is to protect people form blowing themselves (or others) up, or messing with oxygen flow and suffocating either themselves, or others – so as I’ve said, fine, I’m happy with that.

For a monthly fee, £25 in this case, we can call upon the services of British Gas to come out to so the annual servicing, and fixing for free, along with fixing any failures with the heating/hot water system that the boiler is attached to, great

What isn’t so great is that these cowboys try to repeatedly bludgeon you into taking out their entire “white goods” insurance scam policy for at least £60 a month.

Woah, hold on there, I’ve said something controversial, I’ve called it an insurance scam.

It is, and I will explain why.

I’ve lived at the same address for 12 years, all with new appliances from day 1, fridge-freezer, cooker, oven, boiler and washing machine.

In that time, the washing machine has played up twice, the heating/hot water once, the boiler once, and the fridge freezer died.

So, lets look at the costs shall we.

Cost for the repair of the washing machine, £70+£50, boiler = nothing, hot water = nothing, (they cost nothing due to having the insurance of the regular boiler being serviced annually for £25 a month) fridge freezer replacement, £650 (but, note I got a Neff, so not cheap, in fact, one of the best built-in fridge-freezers money could buy, as well as one of the most expensive – it’s lovely).

So, in total, £720, but could have been as little as £550.

Now, the boiler and hot water would have cost about £300 all in to fix., so say £1100.

That’s £1100 in twelve years, or £100 per year.

With British Gas’s HomeServe scam at £60 per *MONTH* that would have been 60*12*12 = £1728.

I’ve just looked at a well-known electrical retailer’s site (no, not Comet as they are now in administration!!!) and here, let’s tot up the costs.

Assuming I didn’t buy the best new fridge-freezer I could have laid my hands on, this little lot could have set me back, 329, washing machine, 270, new gas hob, 230, new oven, 220 – thats £1049.

That’s £700 *CHEAPER* than paying British Gas for the insurance of the items over that same period, and that’s assuming that all the things break – but in actuality, what has broken that needed full on replacement ?

Only the fridge freezer,  which I could have replaced for £329, leaving me around £1400 out of pocket had I taken up British Gas’ “generous” offer of appliance insurance.

Let’s take a second here, I would have had installation issues, as I would need someone else to install the gas hob, but, seriously, when does a stainless steel gas hob ever break ? Near as dammit, never.

Ovens, yeah, they fail, but, the cost of a new one and installation, not going to cut drastically into my £1400 saving of not paying an insurance to British Gas.

So, even *IF* my devices all broke, I’d still be less out of pocket by simply replacing them than I would be if I were paying BritshGas to “maintain” them.

In fact, in my case, they’d have to all fail twice, and require complete replacements before I would be noticeably out pocket by *not* having British Gas’ insurance policy.

Coming down to the financial bottom line, as everything does these days, it costs *MORE* to have these insurance services for your home appliance than it does to replace the bloody things when, and importantly *IF* they fail.

Services such as the British Gas HomeServe are not uncommon, there’s insurance for your Sky Box failing, one for your water pipes to be replaced – I could go on and on.

Bottom line here, as one expects, the insurance companies are ripping us all off – and we as the general public are stupid enough to cough up.

It’s no bloody wonder we as a country don’t have enough money to buy things to get the economy going – we are all paying the banks/insurers for another gamble that is unlikely to pay off.

Legalese……

What a lot of crap.

I’ve been looking at more “tidying” up of this site, amongst others, and finding out what I should and should not have on my site.

One of those things is legal bumpf…

What a minefield.

Cookies, Terms and Conditions, Copyright, Dislaimers, Privacy Policies, Linking Policy, “spam” policy.

Good grief, looking at all that stuff has taken me most of the freaking day…
Most of a day of *NOT* writing/shooting/editing the actual content I want for here.

Wondering if I could I simplify it to:

1) Don’t copy my content, ever.
I will get very shitty with you if I find that out, and you will be subject to legal cease and desist notices for which you will comply.

2) I won’t lie, stuff here will have facts behind it, or evidence to support my opinions.
I may be critical, tough, I expect high standards, lots of people don’t meet them, if you are one of them that I am critical of, buck your ideas up, then I won’t be critical.

3) I will link to other sites, for various reasons, either as examples, or endorsements, or whatever I see fit, the why will be obvious in the article(s).

4) Privacy is a concern, if I allow you to register, I will protect your data, whatever I collect,which won’t be much.
I also won’t share that with anyone, unless some idiot court order tells me to, and even then I will try to fight it.
I also probably won’t look at it myself, and I will do my damnest to make sure others won’t either, they certainly won’t be looking with my permission.

I may use your email address to send you an email that, as you have registered, implies you are interested in some of my content.
If you don’t want to be emailed, let me know, and your account will be terminated.
Your IP address, OS type, browser type, and what you looked at is all logged, that’s for me to find out what content is popular or not, and to give me details about how the server and site is performing.

I won’t be bothered to look at that to trace you personally, I just don’t care, unless you try to hack the site, then, I will be pissed off, so I’ll just simply hand that data to the authorities, and they can come smashing your door down at 04:00…… your choice.

5) I will use cookies somewhere to make the site work, your use of the site is implicit agreement you don’t mind.

6) I may use an advertising service (Google AdSense) – they will use cookies, I can’t do anything about them, if you don’t like it, read their policy, and/or stop your browser accepting them.

7) I may use hard language (including foul language if I decide it’s appropriate) – get over it, and toughen up.
I’m not going to be talking hard core sex here, or violence, or such like, so I’m happy for under 18’s to read it.
If you, as a parent don’t want your kids reading my stuff, other than it’s their (and your) loss – it’s *YOUR* responsibility to know what your kids are doing online, and teach them appropriately, not mine to make my content less objectionable to you (or them).

8) I won’t send out SPAM, and SPAM sent to me will be deleted.
If you receive SPAM you think is from me – keep it, don’t delete it unless you have spoken to me, doing that won’t help me fix it if there is a problem my end.
Inform me, and then I will let you know what bits I need from it to prove/disprove it was/wasn’t me to either fix any issue, or to tell you that you are mistaken.

You send me SPAM, and you are a registered user, I delete your account, and ban your email address.

9) I withhold the right to block any and all access to the site to anyone, or any entity that I decide, it’s my site – so it’s my decision.

You know, it’s not very “politically correct” some of that, or probably legal, but, I think it works.

Shakespeare was right…. “first kill all the lawyers”

(yes …. it should be “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers”. – (Henry VI; Act IV, Scene II).)

Minor rant over…..
Normal service will be resumed soon.

UPDATE: – I’ve added this to the “Legal” pages of the site, as it kinda says a whole host of things that I agree with, I’d not have said them otherwise.

Also, it’s says nothing that the other policies don’t….

Daytime Running lights

Let’s start with an admission, I have an Audi RS4, it has optional Daytime Running Lights (DRL) – and on my version, they are standard incandescent (halogen) bulbs.

I will also admit that I do occasionally have them turned on.

There – those admissions are out of the way.

I however, have a bit of  a problem with DRLs.

The problem I have with DRLs is how they are almost ubiquitous on new cars and they all have one flaw in common, with a notable exception, Volvo. (maybe the now defunct SAAB)

Interestingly, the reason they are ubiquitious, is EU law.

It’s stated here, which basically states that it is a requirement for all new cars and small vans registered after Feb 2011 must be equipped daytime running lights.

The flaw ?

The requirement is only for the *front* of the car, mainly for pedestrians and cyclists.

So – why is that so bad ?

Well, it isn’t for cyclists and pedestrians, it does give them a greater chance of seeing cars that are coming towards them before they cross the road.

However… let’s get back to other road users, and take a look from behind.

The are a awful large proportion of people these days that have no idea how and when to use lights in inclement weather, and let’s be honest, Britain isn’t exactly known for it’s periods of unbroken stunning sunshine.

This spring for example has seen the wettest April in 100 years, (or Oxford, wettest since records began)  – and May hasn’t exactly been better.

The problem with all this rain, at least car related, is that with the large, wide wheels on modern cars, the resultant huge quantity of spray that is kicked up on the motorways can, and regularly does, make visibility horrendous.

Now, as all these people with DRLs go, “I have DRL, no need to turn my lights on, I’m OK”……

HMMM – as so back to the flaw.

DRLs are only on the *front* of the car – which means that all the spray makes the rear of the car almost impossible to see – even more so as these idiots haven’t got their lights on – the proper lights, the dipped lights that actually turn on the rear running lights on a car, the ones that make the rear of the car visible, like they do in the dark at night.

These idiots, I’m not going to call them drivers, as they aren’t, they are passengers with a wheel in front of them, with no clue about what is going on around them, are putting lives of innocent drivers, and any passengers at risk of serious injury or worse, and are effectively got the backing from the EU with the DRL legislation.

Now, the blame isn’t 100% with the drivers of these modern cars.

Some significant blame has to be apportioned to both the manufacturers of the cars, and to the UK and EU legislators for making cars with DRLs that only specify that the DRL are on the front of the car – and not the front and back.

The other issue I have a problem with, and I have seen this more with Mercedes cars than any other cars – is the use of automatic headlights.

There is a very good case for having technology that automates things, but technology has a limit – in the case of automatic lights, there is a sensor that determines how dark it is must be for the lights to be activated.

Trouble is with that there are a number of situations where there is enough light, but visibility isn’t good enough, such conditions can easily be found in heavy rain, with lots of standing water, or fog.

Fog is an interesting one, it can be bright enough to make you squint, but the actual visibility can be horrendously poor – and this is what confuses the automatic sensors on the automatic lighting controls on the cars.

Trouble there – the drivers are so reliant on the technology, they don’t think to do what they must do according to the Highway Code – at minimum, turn their dipped lights on.

They may even think if they have DRL, “I’m ok – I have DRL” – but that isn’t the case – I may be able to see them in my rear-view mirror if they are behind me, however…. and here is, to my mind, the crucial bit………….. I can’t see them when I am behind them.

Volvo know this, their daytime running lights are at both ends of the car… that makes them the safest option.

Question is – why haven’t other manufactures understood this and acted accordingly ?

And the deeper question – why hasn’t the EU realised this, and acted done the right thing and when they mandated DRL for the front of the car, acted with overall safety in mind, and mandated DRL for the read as well ??

After all, the whole reason stated for the DRL EU legislation is safety…
Quoting from the URL ealier,…. “In countries where DRL is already obligatory it has been hailed as a very positive development in the field of road safety.”

Come on people – wake up…
Use your lights appropriately – and EU …… well, slap!, smell the coffee…